若何对待俄罗斯禁赛期由 4 年缩为 2 年，但仍无缘东京奥运和 2022 年世界杯？
先上结论：缩短禁赛期的原因是为了更好的在造裁违规行为和庇护俄罗斯体育安康开展之间获得平衡。
仲裁书结论性定见原文：
“This Panel has imposed consequences to reflect the nature and seriousness of the non-compliance [to the WADC] and to ensure that the integrity of sport against the scourge of doping is maintained. The consequences which the Panel has decided to impose are not as extensive as those sought by WADA. This should not, however, be read as any validation of the conduct of RUSADA or the Russian authorities. In making its orders, the Panel is limited by the powers granted under the applicable law, in particular the WADC and the ISCCS. It has considered matters of proportionality and, in particular, the need to effect cultural change and encourage the next generation of Russian athletes to participate in clean international sport.”
"仲裁小组做出判决，以反映不遵守[世界反兴奋剂委员会]规定的性量和严峻性，并确保维护体育的完好性，反对利用兴奋剂的祸患。专家组决定施加的惩罚没有世界反兴奋剂机构要求的那么普遍。但是，那不该被理解为对俄罗斯反兴奋剂机构或俄罗斯当局行为的承认。小组鄙人达判决时，遭到适用法令，出格是世界反兴奋剂委员会和国际化学品平安委员会所付与的权利的限造。它考虑了相等性原则，出格是考虑了实现文化变化和鼓舞下一代俄罗斯运发动参与清洁国际体育的需要性。"
附：仲裁书全文pdf
CAS arbitration WADA v. RUSADA: Decisionwww.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CAS_Media_Release_6689_decision.pdf